The varietiy of views here indicates how unpredictable
this might be. Either the U.S. vision comes true and the weapons
are found and the Middle East comes to understand why the invasion
was necessary, or the War on Terrorism is set back by the battles
that bear its name..
 |
the big picture |
The Bush Administration's
intentions. |
 |
Ariel Dorfman |
In the balance are not only the dead and mutilated of Iraq
(and who knows how many from the invading force), but the very
real possibility that such an act of pre-emptive,
world-destabilising aggression could spin out of control and
lead to other despots pre-emptively
arming themselves with all manner of apocalyptic weapons and,
perhaps, to Armageddon. Not to mention how such an action seems
destined to recruit even more fanatics for the terrorist groups
who are salivating at the prospect of a US invasion. Ariel
Dorfman February 25, 2003 |
| |
Jordan |
"As the Iraq war twists the arms of America's traditional
allies in the Arab world -- Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Morocco and
others -- the political pain is nowhere greater than in this
small country. Dozens of Jordanians interviewed in recent days
say they feel their country unnervingly close to violent upheaval...credible
evidence that the government is secretly helping in the offensive
on Iraq is the thing that would most quickly turn Jordan's protests
into violent riots. Second on his list would be a military accident
that put a large number of Iraqi civilian casualties on Jordan's
TV screens." James
Rupert, Newsday March 26, 2003 |
 |
the big picture |
" the neocons long ago decided that criticism from the
establishment isn't a reason for self-doubt but the surest sign
that they're on the right track. But their confidence also comes
from the curious fact that much of what could go awry with their
plan will also serve to advance it. A full-scale confrontation
between the United States and political Islam, they believe,
is inevitable, so why not have it now, on our terms, rather
than later, on theirs?" Joshua
Marshall, Washington Monthly, March 31, 2003 |
| |
iranian threat |
" Most experts believe that the mullahs' days are numbered,
and that true democracy will come to Iran. That day will arrive
sooner, the hawks argue, with a democratic Iraq on Iran's border.
But the opposite could happen. If the mullahs are smart, they'll
cooperate just enough with the Americans not to provoke an attack,
but put themselves forth to their own people as defenders of
Iranian independence and Iran's brother Shi'a in southern Iraq
who are living under the American jackboot. Such a strategy
might keep the fundamentalists in power for years longer than
they otherwise might have been." Joshua
Marshall, Washington Monthly, March 31, 2003 |
| |
|
|