archive australian and new zealand architecture and design resources
news archive 2002 (6)
HOME > RESOURCES > NEWS > ARCHIVE > JUNE/JULY 2002

HOME

SELECTED ARCHIVE:

ARCHITECTS
australasian
elsewhere

CONTENT
news archive

ISSUES
heritage
sustainability
forums

PLACES
australasia
europe
americas
the rest

LINKS
schools
zines & blogs
competitions
theory
general
melb consultants
planning + predesign
urban design
practice
computing
weirdness

ABOUT / SERVICES

BOYD HOUSE BICKERING

28.07.02     It's a dead famous architect's own home, in Camberwell, Melbourne. The present owner of the house wants to bowl the back extension but everyone else, except her architectural advisor, seems to be against the idea. The Heritage Council this month refused her permission to proceed with the demolition.

    The owner said that she had no idea that it was Boyd's house when she bought it in 1973, and it had always been her intention to demolish and rebuild. Maria Rajendran also argued that it was impossible to tell which parts of the house were original and which had been altered. These points were rejected by Tara Ferrier, who lived in the house from 1959 to 1973. Ferrier said that no structural alterations were ever made to the house, and the Boyd name was used to sell it. "There was no alteration to Robin Boyd's ideal... To see photos of the house in a state of disrepair is distressing to say the least, let alone seeing Ms Rajendran's incongruous addition to the back of the house."

    The Victorian Heritage Register makes a point of mentioning the alterations and their importance. "The house through its alteration is important in that it demonstrates the architectural development of Robin Boyd, from the early period of his career in the 1940s when he expounded his Theories on 'Victorian Regionalism', to the emerging 'internationalism' of the 1950s."

   Earlier this year, the Victorian Supreme Court ordered Rajendran to replace parts of the extension she had demolished in 1999. The roof had been removed and the interior gutted without a permit. After this ruling the owner said, "if the building is of such state and national importance then the state should own it." Not a bad idea.

ADDRESS 664-666 RIVERSDALE ROAD CAMBERWELL
MORE LINKS:
SAD PHOTOS TAKEN IN 2001 ABC

UTZON DEFINITELY NOT COMING, NO REALLY

24.07.02     The woman's weekly has this week stated that Joern Utzon will not be coming to have a look at the Opera House. Well that's a surprise. Reported in the age (24 July).

NEWS IN THE MAKING 11.07.02

   Joern Utzon said it on the ABC's exclusive interview on TV the other night - that he wasn't returning to Sydney because his health wasn't up to it, he could only fly for "one hour half". The interviewer repeated the question several times using different phrasing. Finally this:

ABC : But you might go back to Sydney maybe?
JOERN UTZON: Yes, just put that in, because that will stop people from asking about it.


Cheekily the ABC took the first four answers and put them in the evening TV interview. They put the last answer alone into the morning Radio interview. Confusion in the making...

The Australian Associated Press compressed the whole story into a news byte : Opera House architect may return . Poor 84 year old Joern will not hear the end of it now.

ARCHITECTURE COMPETITION WITH STRINGS ATTACHED 06.02

<< What, though, might the four short-listed entrants be asked to design? Who will judge, and on what criteria? What, indeed, might a winning scheme offer? Impeccably proportioned plastic windows? Solar-powered lip-sewing carrels? Postmodern razor wire? >>

ELIZABETH FARRELLY DISSECTS THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRE DESIGN COMPETITION, AND IDEALS IN ARCHITECTURE, IN THE SYDNEY MORNING HERALD 18 06 02

THE SHORTLISTED ARCHITECTS

THE WINNER OF THE CHRISTMAS ISLAND DETENTION CENTRE DESIGN COMPETITION
THE BRIEF JUNE 11 2002


NEXT STOP VENICE 09.06.02
     This year's Venice Biennale will be aranged a little differently to the norm. Rather than selecting a bunch of architects to exhibit, a bunch of projects will be selected. This means that there will be a hell of a lot of architects exhibiting, including a first class cabin full from Australia.

The NEXT exhibition will focus on work that is in the process of going up. No blobby cybertecture here. So DCM will be there with the Stonehenge Visitors Centre, Lab with Federation Square, Wood Marsh with Mirvac Tower V. Architekbüro Bolles + Wilson will exhibit the Biblioteca Europea di informazione e cultura in Milan. Tom Kovac is mysteriously listed in the education buildings category for the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology - I'm sure that's already there. ARM will be there with the Melbourne Shrine of Remembrance (the undercroft I presume).Other entries of possible interest could be 12 architects exhibiting their individual projects for the commune at the Great Wall of China, and SOM's work on the World Trade Centre rebuilding in New York.

If you're going you should start rowing soon, the event begins on September 8 and finishes on November 3.

VENICE BIENNALE - NEXT (IT HATES NETSCAPE)
BUTTERPAPER AUSTRALIAN ARCHITECTS



Watch on landmark loo
Re: Kawakawa. Security to be installed in Frederick Hundertwasser's toilet block following minor vandalism. (NZ Herald 26.07.02)

Flat-out developers must realise the whole is more important than its parts
Re: Sydney. NSW Government Architect Chris Johnson argues for the Patternbook. (SMH 25.07.02)

Get the look or you don't get a look-in
Re: Sydney. Review of NSW patternbook for apartment buildings. "If they can just do the same for commercial buildings we'll be able to close all those schools of architecture. Think of the money-and-aggravation that would save" (SMH 23.07.02)

How Sydney's architects seem to favour the bland over the brave
Re: Sydney + Melbourne : Davina Jackson ponders, not for the first time, the differences between the architectures of the two cities.
(SMH 22.07.02)

WTC Renewal Timeline May Be Extended
Re: New York, the public don't like what the LMDC are proposing - too commercial. (Washington post 21.07.02)

Critics yawn over safe Docklands art
Re: Melbourne. Criticism of public sculptures at docklands. (The Age 17.07.02)

Daring design - seeds of 'wow'
Museum's living roof has potential to soar
Re: Renzo Piano in San Francisco. Review of his undulating green proposal for the Californian Academy of Sciences (SF Chronicle 15.07.02)

The walls are alive
Re: Daniel Libeskind. Libeskind writes of the role of music in the development of his recent buildings. (Guardian UK 13.07.02)

Half a new jewel in Sydney's crown
Re: Sydney. Commentary on the politics and architects renovating Sydney's wharfs. (SMH 09.07.02)

IT builds a better system
Re: Construction, BSITE. New government-backed site communications system utilising SMS technology to be tested at Lend Lease Docklands site. (Australian IT 09.07.02)

New heritage laws expose historic sites to developers
Re: Australia. The Register of the National Estate, and the Australian Heritage Commission are to be demolished and their functions rolled into the Environment ministry. This will leave a lot of buildings without a listing. (SMH 09.07.02)

Sydney Opera House project
Re: The ABC interviews Utzon at his home in Majorca about his return to the project. << ABC you might go back to Sydney maybe? UTZON: Yes, just put that in, because that will stop people from asking about it. >> (ABC 08.07.02)

Foreign architectural clones smear Delhi landscape
Re: New Delhi. Second thoughts on a gaudy city. < <After a bathroom tiled structure came up on the Outer Ring Road, we have recommended that all buildings and public structures on the arterial roads must be passed by the commission as they form the public image of the city, >> (Times of India 07.07.02)

Builders named for Spencer St job
Re: Melbourne. Daryl Jackson and Nicholas Grimshaw nab the Spencer Street Railway Station $350M rebuild. ARM and DCM lose. (The Age 02.07.02)

Gov: No replacing towers
Re: New York. The size of the twin towers memorial is causing some arguement, but it now seems certain that at least the two acre footprint of the towers will not be built on. (NY Post 30.06.02)

Ponsonby Road To Get Mainstreet Status Re: Auckland. Ponsonby Road is to become Auckland's 15th street in the mainstreet revitalisation/ cutification programme. (SCOOP 26.06.02)

Trust bid puts kink in Westfield plans
Re: Auckland. Historic Places Trust lists the sleek old Mercury Energy Building in Newmarket, possibly saving the 'burb from a Westfield. (NZ Herald 19.06.02)

Daring, Modernist Homes - on the Cheap Re: New York. William Massie. "Poor man's Gehry" works with CAD CAM at a much smaller scale. (Business Weekly 18.06.02)

Living in a postmodern city
Re: Singapore. Ryan Bishop reviews William Lim's new book.
(Straits Times 17.06.02)

Something old, something new for top designs

Re: Victorian architecture awards results.
(AGE 15.06.02)

Our chance to make a real entrance

Re: Sydney. Elizabeth dissects a new biography of Mr Utzon, and brushes off his recent renovation ideas.
(SMH 11.06.02)

Plan raises fears of a stinkier Venice
Re: Venice. The sinking city is losing residents rapidly. St Marks square floods once every 4 days, so now it's time for some massive civil engineering.
(AGE 11.06.02)

Leave us alone to fix native title mess, says Clark
Re: Australia. Inaugural Mabo lecture says we've got a long way to go.
(SMH 04.06.02)

New colossus at Rhodes
Re: Sydney. Large new housing development in Concord on a site contaminated with agent orange.
(SMH 04.06.02)

Fitzroy gets set for a new development battle
Re: Melbourne. Ivan Rijavec 8 storey apartment block in Fitzroy may face a bit of opposition.
(AGE 01.06.02)

DISCLAIMER
butter paper© 2000-2005 HOME ABOUT REV: 13.12.03 xx.xx.02